The recent promise by local politician Sarah Ferguson in the Courier to make available to the public the names and addresses of sex offenders initially sounds like a sensible idea until you drill down into the ramifications of such material being openly available. On reading it my blood boiled. Who advised her to even entertain the idea?
In a past life I spent nearly 23 years in and out of situations dealing with victims of sexual assault. At one point in the mid-80s I was offered a position to become one of only three male sexual assault counsellors for adolescents in NSW. The difficulty I faced was to decide if I could also include perpetrators. Although I believed that both should receive appropriate counselling the warning bells rang when it was pointed out I could never tell anyone outside the industry what I did, could not publish my address, what about the effects on my family, I already had a silent phone number, be ready at any time to evacuate my place of work and move house but worst of all possibly face being labled, as a counsellor for perpetrators, that I must be one of them too. I declined on the grounds of personal safety.
It is this perception by the community that rings alarms about public lists. Police, Courts, Welfare Departments and a huge majority of people working with children in these situations are determined that such a publication never comes about.
Whilst the intent of publication is benign and meant to protect the community the available data shows that most paedophiles act within the family. They are principally step-fathers but include fathers (and a few mothers) uncles, cousins, brothers and sisters. Stranger danger is but an infinitesimal part of solving the problem. In fact a counsellor in the United States studied that countries information and calculated that if you put your child on the street at birth they would be seventeen by the time any adult tried to interfere with them including sexual advances and only about ten percent would go any further. By comparison the figure of 1 in 4 children are sexually assaulted at some time in their lives suggests 1 in 3 are within the family.
Any sensible person would see the results of publication. Vigilante groups attacking people with the same name (there are at least three of me in Australia), offenders would move house and become ‘of no fixed abode’ and untraceable, the name of the offender would then expose the name of the victim in cases where it is within the family resulting in severe trauma for the child and terrible consequences for their future socialisation by making them an outcast in their own community. They could not go to school, join clubs or play sport due to the stigma attached to being a sexual assault victim. ‘They brought it upon themselves you know’.
It is also dangerous in that it may lead perpetrators to ‘eliminate the child’ so they cannot talk, and no amount of ‘Sorry’ will ever make up for the death of innocence.
I implore the local community not to buy into, or support such a move. Sarah Ferguson and her like, that want to play on the misplaced fears of the electorate to curry favour and gain votes. It is a cynical and dangerous exercise to attempt to convince the less thoughtful, more knee jerk voters that such moves will help. They won’t, they can’t and they shouldn’t.